March 07, 2006

I know everyone was very interested to know what the result of my conversation with the Police Chief was, so I apologize for not posting anything on Monday or Friday. I talked to the Chief on Friday. Initially he assumed that it was my kid that had been arrested, which I didn't realize until about halfway through the conversation. Which I guess implies that he hadn't actually talked to the actual parents of the boy in question. I'm not sure what to make of that...

In any event, I mentioned that my big problem was cuffing the kid. He explained that after sad experience their policy has become cuff anyone 9 and older, which seems awfully young to me, but I guess 9 isn't as young as it used to be. And as I think about some 9 year old wanna-be gang member then I guess I can see where if they really started kicking and punching they could be a handful. But to this I replied, "Surely you have some discretion, I mean this was a kid who wasn't threatening anyone, from the gifted and talented bus. Was it really necessary to cuff him?" But of course he started talking about policy. And he's got a point, in our litigious society the minute you start exercising personal discretion you open yourself up to liability, but as long as you're following policy...

In any event, despite not reaching any kind of a resolution with the Police Chief, I felt better for having talked to him (and the transportation director) . Though perhaps even without talking to them I would have felt better just because of the passage of time. I guess the thing that still bothers me is that even if my kids don't take anything else away from this experience (which is unlikely) they're still going to be left with the lesson that danger is the greatest evil. That the merest hint of a threat, a kid with a small knife, provokes a greater response than anything else they've ever seen. And I'm not sure that's a lesson I really want them to learn.

Searching for self-reliance
Ross

Posted by direkobold at March 7, 2006 11:35 AM
Comments

This remeinds me of an episode of Earl that was being explained to me (as I do not get that channel). He got overpaid and is trying to give the government back $500. After many failed attempts he discovers climbing on the water tower is a $500 fine. So he does, and naturally an accident happens which eventually leads to search and rescue. S&R is a free service to the public even though $4800 was probably spent rescuing them. So for $4800 he was able to write the $500 check to the person who would not accept it since it was against policy O:)

Posted by: ttocS O:) at March 7, 2006 12:31 PM

Don't buy that crap about policy and no discretion. Police have all sorts of discretion, its just a matter of how they use it. No one would have called the cops to find out why the kid wasn't cuffed if the police has decided he wasn't threatening enough to handcuff. The chief is just using that as an excuse.

Posted by: Becky at March 8, 2006 04:13 PM

Find a case where a kid isn't cuffed for having a knife and I'll call to see why not ... I don't think the police cheif was bs'ing.

Posted by: john at March 8, 2006 10:15 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






Powered by Movable Type 2.64

Dire Kobold?SubscribeView from the BushesMembers |
LinksLegalContact Us |

Except where noted copyright © 2002 Sodality, LLC